On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 16:23 +0100, Giovanni Gherdovich wrote: > On Tue, 2021-01-26 at 11:05 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 09:31:40AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > > So, should this patch be merged for 5.11 as a stopgap, fix up > > > schedutil/cpufreq and then test both AMD and Intel chips reporting the > > > correct max non-turbo and max-turbo frequencies? That would give time to > > > give some testing in linux-next before merging to reduce the chance > > > something else falls out. > > > > Yeah, we should probably do this now. Rafael, you want this or should I > > take it? > > Hello Rafael, > > did you have a chance to check this patch? > > It fixes a performance regression from 5.11-rc1, I hoped it could be included > before v5.11 is released. Hello Rafael, you haven't replied to this patch, which was written aiming at v5.11. Do you see any problem with it? Frequency-invariant schedutil needs the driver to advertise a high max_freq to work properly; the patch addresses this for AMD EPYC. Thanks, Giovanni
