Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] ACPI: battery: Clean up printing messages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 7:37 PM Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2021-02-01 at 19:16 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Replace the ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and ACPI_EXCEPTION() instances
> > in battery.c with acpi_handle_debug() and acpi_handle_info() calls,
> > respectively, drop the _COMPONENT and ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definitions
> > that are not used any more, drop the no longer needed
> > ACPI_BATTERY_COMPONENT definition from the headers and update the
> > documentation accordingly.
> >
> > While at it, update the pr_fmt() definition and drop the unneeded
> > PREFIX sybmbol definition from battery.c.
> []
> > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> []
> > @@ -466,7 +460,8 @@ static int extract_package(struct acpi_b
> >  static int acpi_battery_get_status(struct acpi_battery *battery)
> >  {
> >       if (acpi_bus_get_status(battery->device)) {
> > -             ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, AE_ERROR, "Evaluating _STA"));
> > +             acpi_handle_info(battery->device->handle,
> > +                              "_STA evaluation failed\n");
>
> I believe this changes the logging level from KERN_ERR to KERN_INFO.
>
> Perhaps this and others should instead use acpi_handle_err()

Actually, these log level changes, because the messages in question
are not very urgent.

Something doesn't work and it's kind of good to know that, but there's
not much that can be done about it.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux