On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 11:41:59AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 04:41:48PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 4:27 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 04:15:13PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > > ... > > > > Who will use OF_MODALIAS and where have you documented it? > > > > After this lands in mainline, I'll modify the pull request for systemd > > to add a new rule for OF_MODALIAS. > > I'll modify the comment on the function to document the change. > > I'm wondering why to have two fixes in two places instead of fixing udev to > understand multiple MODALIAS= events? It's not a matter of multiple events, it's a single event with a key/value pair with duplicate keys and different values. What is this event with different values supposed to be doing in userspace? Do you want multiple invocations of `modprobe` or something else? Usually a "device" only has a single "signature" that modprobe uses to look up the correct module for. Modules can support any number of device signatures, but traditionally it is odd to think that a device itself can be supported by multiple modules, which is what you are saying is happening here. So what should userspace do with this, and why does a device need to have multiple module alias signatures? thanks, greg k-h