On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 01:39:18PM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 12:40:03AM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
> > On 11/01/2021 14:10, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
...
> > > +/**
> > > + * device_remove_software_node - Remove device's software node
> > > + * @dev: The device with the software node.
> > > + *
> > > + * This function will unregister the software node of @dev.
> > > + */
> > > +void device_remove_software_node(struct device *dev)
> > > +{
> > > + struct swnode *swnode;
> > > +
> > > + swnode = dev_to_swnode(dev);
> > > + if (!swnode)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + kobject_put(&swnode->kobj);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_remove_software_node);
> >
> > I wonder if this also ought to set dev_fwnode(dev)->secondary back to
> > ERR_PTR(-ENODEV)?
Actually it's a good question.
> We can't do that here unfortunately. Other places still have a
> reference to the swnode at this point and they may still need to
> access it using the dev_fwnode(dev)->secondary pointer.
Yeah, but in this case we potentially leave a dangling pointer when last of the
user gone and kobject_put() will call for release.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
