Hi, On 1/12/21 1:07 PM, Jiaxun Yang wrote: > 在 2021/1/12 下午6:42, Hans de Goede 写道: >> Hi, >> >> On 1/8/21 9:52 AM, kernel test robot wrote: > [...] >> >> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate >> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> > [...] >>> 2 errors generated. > > Oops, thanks for the reminder, I should exclude 0day CI from mail filter. > It's wired that GCC didn't say anything about it. > >> Ugh, so that means that the current version of the >> "ACPI: platform-profile: Pass profile pointer to driver callbacks" >> patch is no good. Since this is causing compile errors I assume >> that it will be dropped from the bleeding-edge branch. >> Is that right Rafael? > > I'm not familiar with x86pdx and ACPI workflow. > Should I resend the patch or send a fixup patch? I believe a new version of the patch is best, then Rafael can replace the broken patch. We want to avoid having a commit in git history which does not compile in some cases, because that creates problems when git bisecting. Regards, Hans
