Hi Rafael On 29/12/2020 10:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 12:18 AM Mark Pearson <markpearson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi Hans >> >> On 27/12/2020 06:56, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 12/27/20 6:11 AM, kernel test robot wrote: >>>> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git bleeding-edge >>>> head: a33520709645543f108361fe21fa9434a351c4e9 >>>> commit: 8c9b909fb1282e43792433e6c1cba125ccfc6201 [8612/8615] ACPI: platform-profile: Add platform profile support >>>> config: x86_64-randconfig-a015-20201221 (attached as .config) >>>> compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project cee1e7d14f4628d6174b33640d502bff3b54ae45) >>>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): >>>> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross >>>> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross >>>> # install x86_64 cross compiling tool for clang build >>>> # apt-get install binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu >>>> # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?id=8c9b909fb1282e43792433e6c1cba125ccfc6201 >>>> git remote add pm https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git >>>> git fetch --no-tags pm bleeding-edge >>>> git checkout 8c9b909fb1282e43792433e6c1cba125ccfc6201 >>>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree >>>> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=x86_64 >>>> >>>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate >>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >>>> >>>>>> drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c:147:24: warning: address of array 'pprof->choices' will always evaluate to 'true' [-Wpointer-bool-conversion] >>>> if (!pprof || !pprof->choices || !pprof->profile_set || >>>> ~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~ >>>> 1 warning generated. >>> >>> >>> Ah, this is caused by changing choices from a single long to: >>> >>> unsigned long choices[BITS_TO_LONGS(PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST)]; >>> >>> So that we can use for_each_set_bit and are future proof for more then >>> 32 profiles. >>> >>> To fix this the check should be changed into this (untested): >>> >>> #include <linux/bitmap.h> >>> >>> if (!pprof || bitmap_empty(pprof->choices, PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST) || >>> !pprof->profile_set || !pprof->profile_get) { >>> mutex_unlock(&profile_lock); >>> return -EINVAL; >>> } >>> >>> Mark can you provide a (tested) patch for this? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Hans >>> >> Will do! > > Please note that I'm not going to push the material to Linus with this > warning, so if you want it to go into 5.11, that needs to be addressed > timely. > > Thanks! > Understood :) I tested this last night and it looks good. Do I push this as a v8 patch on the current series or as a new standalone patch? Mark
