Hi Andy
On 24/12/2020 12:24, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 3:14 AM Daniel Scally <djrscally@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> This implements the remaining .graph_* callbacks in the
>
> .graph_* ==> ->graph_*() ?
>
>> fwnode operations structure for the software nodes. That makes
>> the fwnode_graph*() functions available in the drivers also
>
> graph*() -> graph_*() ?
Both done.
>> when software nodes are used.
>>
>> The implementation tries to mimic the "OF graph" as much as
>> possible, but there is no support for the "reg" device
>> property. The ports will need to have the index in their
>> name which starts with "port@" (for example "port@0", "port@1",
>
>> ...)
>
> Looks not good, perhaps move to the previous line, or move port@1 example here?
Fixed - by expanding the lines to ~75 chars
> Few nitpicks here and there, after addressing them,
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
Thank you!
>> +static struct fwnode_handle *
>> +swnode_graph_find_next_port(const struct fwnode_handle *parent,
>> + struct fwnode_handle *port)
>> +{
>> + struct fwnode_handle *old = port;
>> +
>> + while ((port = software_node_get_next_child(parent, old))) {
>> + /*
>> + * ports have naming style "port@n", so we search for children
>> + * that follow that convention (but without assuming anything
>> + * about the index number)
>> + */
>
>> + if (!strncmp(to_swnode(port)->node->name, "port@",
>
> You may use here corresponding _FMT macro.
>> +static int
>> +software_node_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
>> + struct fwnode_endpoint *endpoint)
>> +{
>> + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + /* Ports have naming style "port@n", we need to select the n */
>
>> + ret = kstrtou32(swnode->parent->node->name + FWNODE_GRAPH_PORT_NAME_PREFIX_LEN,
>
> Maybe a temporary variable?
>
> unsigned int prefix_len = FWNODE_GRAPH_PORT_NAME_PREFIX_LEN;
> ...
> ret = kstrtou32(swnode->parent->node->name + prefix_len,
Both discussed after Laurent's reply I think.
