Hi,
On 12/7/20 6:46 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> The ACPI namespace scanning code uses the terms master/slave when
> populating the list of _DEP dependencies, but that use has no
> external exposures and is not mandated by nor associated with any
> external specifications.
>
> Change the language used through-out to supplier/consumer.
>
> No functional impact.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks, patch looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -51,8 +51,8 @@ static u64 spcr_uart_addr;
>
> struct acpi_dep_data {
> struct list_head node;
> - acpi_handle master;
> - acpi_handle slave;
> + acpi_handle supplier;
> + acpi_handle consumer;
> };
>
> void acpi_scan_lock_acquire(void)
> @@ -1881,8 +1881,8 @@ static void acpi_device_dep_initialize(s
> if (!dep)
> return;
>
> - dep->master = dep_devices.handles[i];
> - dep->slave = adev->handle;
> + dep->supplier = dep_devices.handles[i];
> + dep->consumer = adev->handle;
> adev->dep_unmet++;
>
> mutex_lock(&acpi_dep_list_lock);
> @@ -2058,8 +2058,8 @@ void acpi_walk_dep_device_list(acpi_hand
>
> mutex_lock(&acpi_dep_list_lock);
> list_for_each_entry_safe(dep, tmp, &acpi_dep_list, node) {
> - if (dep->master == handle) {
> - acpi_bus_get_device(dep->slave, &adev);
> + if (dep->supplier == handle) {
> + acpi_bus_get_device(dep->consumer, &adev);
> if (!adev)
> continue;
>
>
>
>
