Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the patch.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:31:29PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
> On platforms where ACPI is designed for use with Windows, resources
> that are intended to be consumed by sensor devices are sometimes in
> the _CRS of a dummy INT3472 device upon which the sensor depends. This
> driver binds to the dummy acpi device (which does not represent a
> physical PMIC) and maps them into GPIO lines and regulators for use by
> the sensor device instead.
>
> Suggested-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since RFC v3:
>
> - Patch introduced
>
> This patch contains the bits of this process that we're least sure about.
> The sensors in scope for this work are called out as dependent (in their
> DSDT entry's _DEP) on a device with _HID INT3472. These come in at least
> 2 kinds; those with an I2cSerialBusV2 entry (which we presume therefore
> are legitimate tps68470 PMICs that need handling by those drivers - work
> on that in the future). And those without an I2C device. For those without
> an I2C device they instead have an array of GPIO pins defined in _CRS. So
> for example, my Lenovo Miix 510's OVTI2680 sensor is dependent on one of
> the _latter_ kind of INT3472 devices, with this _CRS:
>
> Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized) // _CRS: Current Resource Settings
> {
> Name (SBUF, ResourceTemplate ()
> {
> GpioIo (Exclusive, PullDefault, 0x0000, 0x0000,
> IoRestrictionOutputOnly, "\\_SB.PCI0.GPI0",
> 0x00, ResourceConsumer, ,
> )
> { // Pin list
> 0x0079
> }
> GpioIo (Exclusive, PullDefault, 0x0000, 0x0000,
> IoRestrictionOutputOnly, "\\_SB.PCI0.GPI0",
> 0x00, ResourceConsumer, ,
> )
> { // Pin list
> 0x007A
> }
> GpioIo (Exclusive, PullDefault, 0x0000, 0x0000,
> IoRestrictionOutputOnly, "\\_SB.PCI0.GPI0",
> 0x00, ResourceConsumer, ,
> )
> { // Pin list
> 0x008F
> }
> })
> Return (SBUF) /* \_SB_.PCI0.PMI1._CRS.SBUF */
> }
>
> and the same device has a _DSM Method, which returns 32-bit ints where
> the second lowest byte we noticed to match the pin numbers of the GPIO
> lines:
>
> Method (_DSM, 4, NotSerialized) // _DSM: Device-Specific Method
> {
> If ((Arg0 == ToUUID ("79234640-9e10-4fea-a5c1-b5aa8b19756f")))
> {
> If ((Arg2 == One))
> {
> Return (0x03)
> }
>
> If ((Arg2 == 0x02))
> {
> Return (0x01007900)
> }
>
> If ((Arg2 == 0x03))
> {
> Return (0x01007A0C)
> }
>
> If ((Arg2 == 0x04))
> {
> Return (0x01008F01)
> }
> }
>
> Return (Zero)
> }
>
> We know that at least some of those pins have to be toggled active for the
> sensor devices to be available in i2c, so the conclusion we came to was
> that those GPIO entries assigned to the INT3472 device actually represent
> GPIOs and regulators to be consumed by the sensors themselves. Tsuchiya
> noticed that the lowest byte in the return values of the _DSM method
> seemed to represent the type or function of the GPIO line, and we
> confirmed that by testing on each surface device that GPIO lines where the
> low byte in the _DSM entry for that pin was 0x0d controlled the privacy
> LED of the cameras.
>
> We're guessing as to the exact meaning of the function byte, but I
> conclude they're something like this:
>
> 0x00 - probably a reset GPIO
> 0x01 - regulator for the sensor
> 0x0c - regulator for the sensor
> 0x0b - regulator again, but for a VCM or EEPROM
> 0x0d - privacy led (only one we're totally confident of since we can see
> it happen!)
>
> After much internal debate I decided to write this as a standalone
> acpi_driver. Alternative options we considered:
>
> 1. Squash all this into the cio2-bridge code, which I did originally write
> but decided I didn't like.
> 2. Extend the existing tps68470 mfd driver...they share an ACPI ID so this
> kinda makes sense, but ultimately given there is no actual physical
> tps68470 in the scenario this patch handles I decided I didn't like this
> either.
>
> MAINTAINERS | 7 +
> drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Kconfig | 14 +
> drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/int3472.c | 381 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/int3472.h | 96 +++++++
> 5 files changed, 499 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/int3472.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/int3472.h
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 188559a0a610..d73471f9c2a3 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -8753,6 +8753,13 @@ L: linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> S: Maintained
> F: drivers/crypto/inside-secure/
>
> +INT3472 ACPI DEVICE DRIVER
> +M: Daniel Scally <djrscally@xxxxxxxxx>
> +L: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> +S: Maintained
> +F: drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/int3472.c
> +F: drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/int3472.h
> +
> INTEGRITY MEASUREMENT ARCHITECTURE (IMA)
> M: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> M: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@xxxxxxxxx>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Kconfig b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Kconfig
> index 2b3350d042be..9dd3b280f821 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Kconfig
> @@ -34,3 +34,17 @@ config CIO2_BRIDGE
> - Dell 7285
>
> If in doubt, say N here.
> +
> +config INT3472
> + tristate "INT3472 Dummy ACPI Device Driver"
> + depends on VIDEO_IPU3_CIO2
> + depends on ACPI && REGULATOR && GPIOLIB
> + help
> + This module provides an ACPI driver for INT3472 devices that do not
> + represent an actual physical tps68470 device.
> +
> + Say Y here if your device is a detachable / hybrid laptop that comes
> + with Windows installed by the OEM.
> + The module will be called int3472.
> +
> + If in doubt, say N here.
> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Makefile b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Makefile
> index 933777e6ea8a..2285947b2bd2 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Makefile
> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_IPU3_CIO2) += ipu3-cio2.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_INT3472) += int3472.o
>
> ipu3-cio2-y += ipu3-cio2-main.o
> ipu3-cio2-$(CONFIG_CIO2_BRIDGE) += cio2-bridge.o
> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/int3472.c b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/int3472.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..6b0be75f7f35
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/int3472.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,381 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Author: Dan Scally <djrscally@xxxxxxxxx> */
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/machine.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/driver.h>
> +
> +#include "int3472.h"
> +
> +/*
> + * The regulators have to have .ops to be valid, but the only ops we actually
> + * support are .enable and .disable which are handled via .ena_gpiod. Pass an
> + * empty struct to clear the check without lying about capabilities.
> + */
> +static const struct regulator_ops int3472_gpio_regulator_ops = { 0 };
> +
> +static int int3472_map_gpio_to_sensor(struct int3472_device *int3472,
> + struct acpi_resource *ares, char *func)
> +{
> + char *path = ares->data.gpio.resource_source.string_ptr;
> + struct gpiod_lookup table_entry;
> + struct acpi_device *adev;
> + acpi_handle handle;
> + acpi_status status;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Make sure we don't overflow, and leave room for a terminator */
> + if (int3472->n_sensor_gpios >= INT3472_MAX_SENSOR_GPIOS) {
> + dev_warn(&int3472->sensor->dev, "Too many GPIOs mapped\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* Fetch ACPI handle for the GPIO chip */
> + status = acpi_get_handle(NULL, path, &handle);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &adev);
> + if (ret)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + table_entry = (struct gpiod_lookup)GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX(acpi_dev_name(adev),
> + ares->data.gpio.pin_table[0],
> + func, 0, GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH);
> +
> + memcpy(&int3472->gpios.table[int3472->n_sensor_gpios], &table_entry,
> + sizeof(table_entry));
> + int3472->n_sensor_gpios++;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct int3472_sensor_regulator_map *
> +int3472_get_sensor_supply_map(struct int3472_device *int3472)
> +{
> + struct int3472_sensor_regulator_map *ret;
> + union acpi_object *obj;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + /*
> + * Sensor modules seem to be identified by a unique string. We use that
> + * to make sure we pass the right device and supply names to the new
> + * regulator's consumer_supplies
> + */
> + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(int3472->sensor->handle,
> + &cio2_sensor_module_guid, 0x00,
> + 0x01, NULL, ACPI_TYPE_STRING);
> +
> + if (!obj) {
> + dev_err(&int3472->sensor->dev,
> + "Failed to get sensor module string from _DSM\n");
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> + }
> +
> + if (obj->string.type != ACPI_TYPE_STRING) {
> + dev_err(&int3472->sensor->dev,
> + "Sensor _DSM returned a non-string value\n");
> + ret = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + goto out_free_obj;
> + }
> +
> + ret = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(int3472_sensor_regulator_maps); i++) {
> + if (!strcmp(int3472_sensor_regulator_maps[i].sensor_module_name,
> + obj->string.pointer)) {
> + ret = &int3472_sensor_regulator_maps[i];
> + goto out_free_obj;
> + }
> + }
> +
> +out_free_obj:
> + ACPI_FREE(obj);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int int3472_register_regulator(struct int3472_device *int3472,
> + struct acpi_resource *ares)
> +{
> + char *path = ares->data.gpio.resource_source.string_ptr;
> + struct int3472_sensor_regulator_map *regulator_map;
> + struct regulator_init_data init_data = { };
> + struct int3472_gpio_regulator *regulator;
> + struct regulator_config cfg = { };
> + int ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * We lookup supply names from machine specific tables, based on a
> + * unique identifier in the sensor's _DSM
> + */
> + regulator_map = int3472_get_sensor_supply_map(int3472);
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(regulator_map)) {
> + dev_err(&int3472->sensor->dev,
> + "Found no supplies defined for this sensor\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(regulator_map);
> + }
> +
> + if (int3472->n_regulators >= regulator_map->n_supplies) {
> + dev_err(&int3472->sensor->dev,
> + "All known supplies are already mapped\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + init_data.supply_regulator = NULL;
> + init_data.constraints.valid_ops_mask = REGULATOR_CHANGE_STATUS;
> + init_data.num_consumer_supplies = 1;
> + init_data.consumer_supplies = ®ulator_map->supplies[int3472->n_regulators];
> +
> + regulator = kmalloc(sizeof(*regulator), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!regulator)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + snprintf(regulator->regulator_name, GPIO_REGULATOR_NAME_LENGTH,
> + "gpio-regulator-%d", int3472->n_regulators);
> + snprintf(regulator->supply_name, GPIO_REGULATOR_SUPPLY_NAME_LENGTH,
> + "supply-%d", int3472->n_regulators);
> +
> + regulator->rdesc = INT3472_REGULATOR(regulator->regulator_name,
> + regulator->supply_name,
> + int3472->n_regulators,
> + &int3472_gpio_regulator_ops);
> +
> + regulator->gpio = acpi_get_gpiod(path, ares->data.gpio.pin_table[0]);
> + if (IS_ERR(regulator->gpio)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(regulator->gpio);
> + goto err_free_regulator;
> + }
> +
> + cfg.dev = &int3472->adev->dev;
> + cfg.init_data = &init_data;
> + cfg.ena_gpiod = regulator->gpio;
> +
> + regulator->rdev = regulator_register(®ulator->rdesc, &cfg);
> + if (IS_ERR(regulator->rdev)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(regulator->rdev);
> + goto err_free_gpio;
> + }
> +
> + list_add(®ulator->list, &int3472->regulators);
> + int3472->n_regulators++;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_free_gpio:
> + gpiod_put(regulator->gpio);
> +err_free_regulator:
> + kfree(regulator);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int int3472_handle_gpio_resources(struct acpi_resource *ares,
> + void *data)
> +{
> + struct int3472_device *int3472 = data;
> + union acpi_object *obj;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (ares->type != ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_GPIO ||
> + ares->data.gpio.connection_type != ACPI_RESOURCE_GPIO_TYPE_IO)
> + return EINVAL; /* Deliberately positive */
> +
> + /*
> + * n_gpios + 2 because the index of this _DSM function is 1-based and
> + * the first function is just a count.
> + */
> + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(int3472->adev->handle,
> + &int3472_gpio_guid, 0x00,
> + int3472->n_gpios + 2,
> + NULL, ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER);
> +
> + if (!obj) {
> + dev_warn(&int3472->adev->dev,
> + "No _DSM entry for this GPIO pin\n");
> + return ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + switch (obj->integer.value & 0xff) { /* low byte holds type data */
> + case 0x00: /* Purpose unclear, possibly a reset GPIO pin */
> + ret = int3472_map_gpio_to_sensor(int3472, ares, "reset");
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(&int3472->adev->dev,
> + "Failed to map reset pin to sensor\n");
> +
> + break;
> + case 0x01: /* Power regulators (we think) */
> + case 0x0c:
> + ret = int3472_register_regulator(int3472, ares);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(&int3472->adev->dev,
> + "Failed to map regulator to sensor\n");
> +
> + break;
> + case 0x0b: /* Power regulators, but to a device separate to sensor */
> + ret = int3472_register_regulator(int3472, ares);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(&int3472->adev->dev,
> + "Failed to map regulator to sensor\n");
> +
> + break;
> + case 0x0d: /* Indicator LEDs */
> + ret = int3472_map_gpio_to_sensor(int3472, ares, "indicator-led");
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(&int3472->adev->dev,
> + "Failed to map indicator led to sensor\n");
> +
> + break;
> + default:
> + /* if we've gotten here, we're not sure what they are yet */
> + dev_warn(&int3472->adev->dev,
> + "GPIO type 0x%llx unknown; the sensor may not work\n",
> + (obj->integer.value & 0xff));
> + ret = EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + int3472->n_gpios++;
> + ACPI_FREE(obj);
> + return abs(ret);
> +}
> +
> +static void int3472_parse_crs(struct int3472_device *int3472)
> +{
> + struct list_head resource_list;
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
> +
> + acpi_dev_get_resources(int3472->adev, &resource_list,
> + int3472_handle_gpio_resources, int3472);
> +
> + acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
> + gpiod_add_lookup_table(&int3472->gpios);
> +}
> +
> +static int int3472_add(struct acpi_device *adev)
> +{
> + struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
> + struct int3472_device *int3472;
> + struct int3472_cldb cldb;
> + union acpi_object *obj;
> + acpi_status status;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * This driver is only intended to support "dummy" INT3472 devices
> + * which appear in ACPI designed for Windows. These are distinguishable
> + * from INT3472 entries representing an actual tps68470 PMIC through
> + * the presence of a CLDB buffer with a particular value set.
> + */
> + status = acpi_evaluate_object(adev->handle, "CLDB", NULL, &buffer);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + obj = buffer.pointer;
> + if (!obj) {
> + dev_err(&adev->dev, "ACPI device has no CLDB object\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
> + dev_err(&adev->dev, "CLDB object is not an ACPI buffer\n");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_free_buff;
> + }
> +
> + if (obj->buffer.length > sizeof(cldb)) {
> + dev_err(&adev->dev, "The CLDB buffer is too large\n");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_free_buff;
> + }
> +
> + memcpy(&cldb, obj->buffer.pointer, obj->buffer.length);
> +
> + /*
> + * control_logic_type = 1 indicates this is a dummy INT3472 device of
> + * the kind we're looking for. If any other value then we shouldn't try
> + * to handle it
> + */
> + if (cldb.control_logic_type != 1) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_free_buff;
> + }
> +
> + /* Space for 4 GPIOs - one more than we've seen so far plus a null */
> + int3472 = kzalloc(sizeof(*int3472) +
> + ((INT3472_MAX_SENSOR_GPIOS + 1) * sizeof(struct gpiod_lookup)),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!int3472) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_free_buff;
> + }
> +
> + int3472->adev = adev;
> + adev->driver_data = int3472;
> +
> + int3472->sensor = acpi_dev_get_next_dep_dev(adev, NULL);
> + if (!int3472->sensor) {
> + dev_err(&adev->dev,
> + "This INT3472 entry seems to have no dependents.\n");
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto out_free_int3472;
> + }
> +
> + int3472->gpios.dev_id = i2c_acpi_dev_name(int3472->sensor);
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&int3472->regulators);
> +
> + int3472_parse_crs(int3472);
> +
> + goto out_free_buff;
> +
> +out_free_int3472:
> + kfree(int3472);
> +out_free_buff:
> + kfree(buffer.pointer);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int int3472_remove(struct acpi_device *adev)
> +{
> + struct int3472_gpio_regulator *reg;
> + struct int3472_device *int3472;
> +
> + int3472 = acpi_driver_data(adev);
> +
> + acpi_dev_put(int3472->sensor);
> + gpiod_remove_lookup_table(&int3472->gpios);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(reg, &int3472->regulators, list) {
> + gpiod_put(reg->gpio);
> + regulator_unregister(reg->rdev);
> + }
> +
> + kfree(int3472);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct acpi_device_id int3472_device_id[] = {
> + { "INT3472", 0 },
The INT3472 _HID is really allocated for the tps68470 PMIC chip. It may not
be used by other drivers; people will want to build kernels where both of
these ACPI table layouts are functional.
Instead, I propose, that you add this as an option to the tps68470 driver
that figures out whether the ACPI device for the tps68470 device actually
describes something else, in a similar fashion you do with the cio2-bridge
driver. I think it may need a separate Kconfig option albeit this and
cio2-bridge cannot be used separately.
> + { },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, int3472_device_id);
> +
> +static struct acpi_driver int3472_driver = {
> + .name = "int3472",
> + .ids = int3472_device_id,
> + .ops = {
> + .add = int3472_add,
> + .remove = int3472_remove,
> + },
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +};
> +
> +module_acpi_driver(int3472_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Dan Scally <djrscally@xxxxxxxxx>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ACPI Driver for Discrete type INT3472 ACPI Devices");
> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/int3472.h b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/int3472.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..6964726e8e1f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/int3472.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/* Author: Dan Scally <djrscally@xxxxxxxxx> */
> +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h>
> +
> +#define INT3472_MAX_SENSOR_GPIOS 3
> +#define GPIO_REGULATOR_NAME_LENGTH 17
> +#define GPIO_REGULATOR_SUPPLY_NAME_LENGTH 9
> +
> +#define INT3472_REGULATOR(_NAME, _SUPPLY, _ID, _OPS) \
> + ((const struct regulator_desc) { \
> + .name = _NAME, \
> + .supply_name = _SUPPLY, \
> + .id = _ID, \
> + .type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, \
> + .ops = _OPS, \
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE, \
> + })
> +
> +const guid_t int3472_gpio_guid = GUID_INIT(0x79234640, 0x9e10, 0x4fea,
> + 0xa5, 0xc1, 0xb5, 0xaa, 0x8b,
> + 0x19, 0x75, 0x6f);
> +
> +const guid_t cio2_sensor_module_guid = GUID_INIT(0x822ace8f, 0x2814, 0x4174,
> + 0xa5, 0x6b, 0x5f, 0x02, 0x9f,
> + 0xe0, 0x79, 0xee);
> +
> +struct int3472_cldb {
> + u8 version;
> + /*
> + * control logic type
> + * 0: UNKNOWN
> + * 1: DISCRETE(CRD-D)
> + * 2: PMIC TPS68470
> + * 3: PMIC uP6641
> + */
> + u8 control_logic_type;
> + u8 control_logic_id;
> + u8 sensor_card_sku;
> + u8 reserved[28];
> +};
> +
> +struct int3472_device {
> + struct acpi_device *adev;
> + struct acpi_device *sensor;
> +
> + unsigned int n_gpios; /* how many GPIOs have we seen */
> +
> + unsigned int n_regulators;
> + struct list_head regulators;
> +
> + unsigned int n_sensor_gpios; /* how many have we mapped to sensor */
> + struct gpiod_lookup_table gpios;
> +};
> +
> +struct int3472_gpio_regulator {
> + char regulator_name[GPIO_REGULATOR_NAME_LENGTH];
> + char supply_name[GPIO_REGULATOR_SUPPLY_NAME_LENGTH];
> + struct gpio_desc *gpio;
> + struct regulator_dev *rdev;
> + struct regulator_desc rdesc;
> + struct list_head list;
> +};
> +
> +struct int3472_sensor_regulator_map {
> + char *sensor_module_name;
> + unsigned int n_supplies;
> + struct regulator_consumer_supply *supplies;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Here follows platform specific mapping information that we can pass to
> + * regulator_init_data when we register our regulators. They're just mapped
> + * via index, I.E. the first regulator pin that the code finds for the
> + * i2c-OVTI2680:00 device is avdd, the second is dovdd and so on.
> + */
> +
> +static struct regulator_consumer_supply miix_510_ov2680[] = {
> + { "i2c-OVTI2680:00", "avdd" },
> + { "i2c-OVTI2680:00", "dovdd" },
> +};
> +
> +static struct regulator_consumer_supply surface_go2_ov5693[] = {
> + { "i2c-INT33BE:00", "avdd" },
> + { "i2c-INT33BE:00", "dovdd" },
> +};
> +
> +static struct regulator_consumer_supply surface_book_ov5693[] = {
> + { "i2c-INT33BE:00", "avdd" },
> + { "i2c-INT33BE:00", "dovdd" },
> +};
> +
> +static struct int3472_sensor_regulator_map int3472_sensor_regulator_maps[] = {
> + { "GNDF140809R", 2, miix_510_ov2680 },
> + { "YHCU", 2, surface_go2_ov5693 },
> + { "MSHW0070", 2, surface_book_ov5693 },
> +};
--
Kind regards,
Sakari Ailus
