On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 2:26 AM Youling Tang <tangyouling@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> kfree() has been called inside put_device so anther kfree would cause a
> use-after-free bug.
>
> Signed-off-by: Youling Tang <tangyouling@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c
> index 9d6c0fc..18edf8b 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c
> @@ -142,7 +142,6 @@ static void ipmi_dev_release(struct acpi_ipmi_device *ipmi_device)
> {
> ipmi_destroy_user(ipmi_device->user_interface);
> put_device(ipmi_device->dev);
Does putting ipmi_device->dev (which is a different object than
ipmi_device itself) really cause ipmi_device to be freed
automatically? If not, the change below will introduce a memory leak.
> - kfree(ipmi_device);
> }
>
> static void ipmi_dev_release_kref(struct kref *kref)
> --
