Hi, On 11/10/20 3:47 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 1:14 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 11/10/20 11:10 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 1:33 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ... > >>> I think in general the direction to switch to fwnode is a good one. I >>> was thinking about moving i2c core to use swnodes in which case they >>> will utilize fwnode pointer. But it might have complications, you are >>> right. >> >> So do you agree to just keep this series in the archives (in case we need >> it later) for now ? Or would you still like me to post a non RFC version ? > > If nobody else has a different opinion (Heikki, Wolfram, Rafael?), I'm > fine with it to be in archives for the time being. Since no-one else has responded, lets just keep this series for the archives. Andy, that also means that there no longer is a reason to hold of merging your i2c-multi-instantiate cleanup series (minus patch 3 as discussed), so I've merged that into my review-hans branch now. Regards, Hans
