The commit 9c19b8930d2c ("rtc: ds1307: Add ACPI support") added invalid
ACPI IDs (all of them are abusing ACPI specification). Moreover there is
not even a single evidence that vendor registered any of such devices.
Remove broken ACPI IDs from the driver. For prototyping one may use PRP0001
with device properties adhering to a DT binding. The following patches
will add support of that to the driver.
Link: https://uefi.org/PNP_ACPI_Registry
Cc: Tin Huynh <tnhuynh@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: reworded commit message to clarify source of properties (Rafael)
drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c | 36 +-----------------------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
index 9f5f54ca039d..fcb8e281abd5 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
* Copyright (C) 2012 Bertrand Achard (nvram access fixes)
*/
-#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/bcd.h>
#include <linux/i2c.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
@@ -1169,31 +1168,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id ds1307_of_match[] = {
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ds1307_of_match);
#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
-static const struct acpi_device_id ds1307_acpi_ids[] = {
- { .id = "DS1307", .driver_data = ds_1307 },
- { .id = "DS1308", .driver_data = ds_1308 },
- { .id = "DS1337", .driver_data = ds_1337 },
- { .id = "DS1338", .driver_data = ds_1338 },
- { .id = "DS1339", .driver_data = ds_1339 },
- { .id = "DS1388", .driver_data = ds_1388 },
- { .id = "DS1340", .driver_data = ds_1340 },
- { .id = "DS1341", .driver_data = ds_1341 },
- { .id = "DS3231", .driver_data = ds_3231 },
- { .id = "M41T0", .driver_data = m41t0 },
- { .id = "M41T00", .driver_data = m41t00 },
- { .id = "M41T11", .driver_data = m41t11 },
- { .id = "MCP7940X", .driver_data = mcp794xx },
- { .id = "MCP7941X", .driver_data = mcp794xx },
- { .id = "PT7C4338", .driver_data = ds_1307 },
- { .id = "RX8025", .driver_data = rx_8025 },
- { .id = "ISL12057", .driver_data = ds_1337 },
- { .id = "RX8130", .driver_data = rx_8130 },
- { }
-};
-MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, ds1307_acpi_ids);
-#endif
-
/*
* The ds1337 and ds1339 both have two alarms, but we only use the first
* one (with a "seconds" field). For ds1337 we expect nINTA is our alarm
@@ -1794,14 +1768,7 @@ static int ds1307_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
chip = &chips[id->driver_data];
ds1307->type = id->driver_data;
} else {
- const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_id;
-
- acpi_id = acpi_match_device(ACPI_PTR(ds1307_acpi_ids),
- ds1307->dev);
- if (!acpi_id)
- return -ENODEV;
- chip = &chips[acpi_id->driver_data];
- ds1307->type = acpi_id->driver_data;
+ return -ENODEV;
}
want_irq = client->irq > 0 && chip->alarm;
@@ -2065,7 +2032,6 @@ static struct i2c_driver ds1307_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "rtc-ds1307",
.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(ds1307_of_match),
- .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(ds1307_acpi_ids),
},
.probe = ds1307_probe,
.id_table = ds1307_id,
--
2.28.0
