Re: [PATCH] ACPICA: fix -Wfallthrough

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14 AM Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 1:09 AM Nick Desaulniers
> <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for the explicit diagnostics observed.  Something fishy is
> > going on though, https://godbolt.org/z/Gbxbxa is how I expect MSVC to
> > handle include/linux/compiler_attributes.h.
> >
> > The C preprocessor should make it such that MSVC never sees
> > `__attribute__` or `__fallthrough__`; that it does begs the question.
> > That would seem to imply that `#if __has_attribute(__fallthrough__)`
> > somehow evaluates to true on MSVC, but my godbolt link shows it does
> > not.
> >
> > Could the upstream ACPICA project be #define'ing something that could
> > be altering this? (Or not #define'ing something?)
> >
> > Worst case, we could do as Joe Perches suggested and disable
> > -Wfallthrough for drivers/acpi/acpica/.
>
> I agree, something is fishy. MSVC has several flags for conformance
> and extensions support, including two full C preprocessors in newer
> versions; which means we might be missing something, but I don't see
> how the code in compiler_attributes.h could be confusing MSVC even in
> older non-conforming versions.

unless
```
# define fallthrough                    __attribute__((__fallthrough__))
```
was copy and pasted into the code, rather than #including the whole header?

-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux