Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Fix up ACPI processor idle vs RCU

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Fix up ACPI processor idle vs RCU
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 20:31:50 +0200
Cc: rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx, lenb@xxxxxxxxxx, daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20200915103157.345404192@infradead.org>
References: <20200915103157.345404192@infradead.org>

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:31:57PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Boris tested an earlier version of these patches and they worked for his
> 32bit Atom board that was triggering complaints.

Want me to test them again?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

References:
- [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Fix up ACPI processor idle vs RCU
  - From: Peter Zijlstra

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v15 0/2] ACPI / APEI: Add support to notify the vendor specific HW errors
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] acpi/nfit: Use kobj_to_dev() instead
Previous by thread: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] acpi: Use CPUIDLE_FLAG_TLB_FLUSHED
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux IBM ACPI] [Linux Power Management] [Linux Kernel] [Linux Laptop] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux