On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 5:16 AM Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 09:29:59AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 2:35 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:40:27AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On 8/24/2020 12:30 PM, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Patchset Summary: > > > >> Enhance a PCIe host controller driver. Because of its unusual design > > > >> we are foced to change dev->dma_pfn_offset into a more general role > > > >> allowing multiple offsets. See the 'v1' notes below for more info. > > > > > > > > We are version 11 and counting, and it is not clear to me whether there is > > > > any chance of getting these patches reviewed and hopefully merged for the > > > > 5.10 merge window. > > > > > > > > There are a lot of different files being touched, so what would be the > > > > ideal way of routing those changes towards inclusion? > > > > > > FYI, I offered to take the dma-mapping bits through the dma-mapping tree. > > > I have a bit of a backlog, but plan to review and if Jim is ok with that > > > apply the current version. > > Sounds good to me. > > Hi Jim, > > is the dependency now solved ? Should we review/take this series as > is for v5.10 through the PCI tree ? Hello Lorenzo, We are still working out a regression with the DMA offset commit on the RaspberryPi. Nicolas has found the root cause and we are now devising a solution. Thanks, Jim Quinlan Broadcom STB > > Thanks, > Lorenzo
