On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 05:11:55PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 7:57 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Fix description of handle parameter in documentation of acpi_is_root_bridge(). > > Otherwise we get the following warning: > > > > CHECK drivers/acpi/pci_root.c > > drivers/acpi/pci_root.c:71: warning: Function parameter or member 'handle' not described in 'acpi_is_root_bridge' > > I'm not sure why this patch doesn't go by itself. It appears to be > immediately applicable. Just appears when I working on the rest of the series. Can be standalone if it makes more sense. > I'll apply it next week if Bjorn doesn't object. At least fine with me, thanks! > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > --- > > drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c > > index 2a6a741896de..f723679954d7 100644 > > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c > > @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(osc_lock); > > > > /** > > * acpi_is_root_bridge - determine whether an ACPI CA node is a PCI root bridge > > - * @handle - the ACPI CA node in question. > > + * @handle: the ACPI CA node in question. > > * > > * Note: we could make this API take a struct acpi_device * instead, but > > * for now, it's more convenient to operate on an acpi_handle. > > -- > > 2.28.0 > > -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
