Re: power-off delay/hang due to commit 6d25be57 (mainline)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-08-11 19:22:19 [+0200], Stephen Berman wrote:
> Attached.

ssdt6.dsl:
|  ThermalZone (TZ10)
|  {
…
|      Method (_TSP, 0, Serialized)  // _TSP: Thermal Sampling Period
|      {
|          Return (0x0A)
|      }
|
|      Method (_TZP, 0, Serialized)  // _TZP: Thermal Zone Polling
|      {
|          Return (0x0A)
|      }
|
|      Method (_TMP, 0, Serialized)  // _TMP: Temperature
|      {
|          \GSA1.ZRC3 ()
|          Sleep (0x03E8)
|          Notify (\_TZ.TZ10, 0x81) // Thermal Trip Point Change
|          Return (0x0B54)
|      }

So if I read this correctly then TZ10 should be polled every second
(check) and the temperature function contains a `sleep(1 second)' (which
explains the mysteries delay) followed by the Notify() (which schedules
the worker).

Now I'm curious if Windows has the same ACPI tables and if so how they
behave here. And what the actual plan here was. And where is the border
when one is actual allowed to make fun of someone. So many questions. 

> Done as Bug 208877.

Thank you.

> Steve Berman

Sebastian




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux