Hi Bjorn, >-----Original Message----- >From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx] >Sent: 24 July 2020 00:23 >To: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@xxxxxxxxxx> >Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- >kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; bp@xxxxxxxxx; >james.morse@xxxxxxx; lenb@xxxxxxxxxx; tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx; >dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx; zhangliguang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Wangkefeng (OS Kernel Lab) ><wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>; jroedel@xxxxxxx; Linuxarm ><linuxarm@xxxxxxxxxx>; yangyicong <yangyicong@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jonathan >Cameron <jonathan.cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>; tanxiaofei ><tanxiaofei@xxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 0/2] ACPI / APEI: Add support to notify the vendor >specific HW errors > >On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:42:43AM +0100, Shiju Jose wrote: >> CPER records describing a firmware-first error are identified by GUID. >> The ghes driver currently logs, but ignores any unknown CPER records. >> This prevents describing errors that can't be represented by a >> standard entry, that would otherwise allow a driver to recover from an >error. >> The UEFI spec calls these 'Non-standard Section Body' (N.2.3 of >> version 2.8). >> >> patch set >> 1. add a notifier chain for these non-standard/vendor-records >> in the ghes driver. >> >> 2. add a driver to handle HiSilicon HIP PCIe controller's errors. >> >> Changes: >> >> V13: >> 1. Following changes in the HIP PCIe error handling driver. >> 1.1 Add Bjorn's acked-by. >> 1.2. Address the comments and macros order Bjorn mentioned. >> Fix the words in the commit. > >This series is ill-formed: > > - Jul 22 5:39 Shiju Jose [PATCH v13 0/2] ACPI / APEI: Add support to not > - Jul 22 5:39 Shiju Jose └─>[PATCH v13 1/2] ACPI / APEI: Add a notifier > - Jul 22 5:42 Shiju Jose [PATCH v13 0/2] ACPI / APEI: Add support to not > - Jul 22 5:42 Shiju Jose └─>[PATCH v13 2/2] PCI: hip: Add handling of Hi git send-email failed to send out one patch each time in the patch series due to some internal error. > >Patches 1/2 and 2/2 never appear in the same thread. Both should be replies >to 0/2. And should be only *one* v13 0/2, not two :) > >Bjorn Thanks, Shiju
