Hello,
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 02:17:52PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> The pwm-crc code is using 2 different enable bits:
> 1. bit 7 of the PWM0_CLK_DIV (PWM_OUTPUT_ENABLE)
> 2. bit 0 of the BACKLIGHT_EN register
>
> So far we've kept the PWM_OUTPUT_ENABLE bit set when disabling the PWM,
> this commit makes crc_pwm_disable() clear it on disable and makes
> crc_pwm_enable() set it again on re-enable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Remove paragraph about tri-stating the output from the commit message,
> we don't have a datasheet so this was just an unfounded guess
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
> index 81232da0c767..b72008c9b072 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,9 @@ static int crc_pwm_calc_clk_div(int period_ns)
> static int crc_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *c, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> {
> struct crystalcove_pwm *crc_pwm = to_crc_pwm(c);
> + int div = crc_pwm_calc_clk_div(pwm_get_period(pwm));
>
> + regmap_write(crc_pwm->regmap, PWM0_CLK_DIV, div | PWM_OUTPUT_ENABLE);
> regmap_write(crc_pwm->regmap, BACKLIGHT_EN, 1);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -63,8 +65,10 @@ static int crc_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *c, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> static void crc_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *c, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> {
> struct crystalcove_pwm *crc_pwm = to_crc_pwm(c);
> + int div = crc_pwm_calc_clk_div(pwm_get_period(pwm));
>
> regmap_write(crc_pwm->regmap, BACKLIGHT_EN, 0);
> + regmap_write(crc_pwm->regmap, PWM0_CLK_DIV, div);
> }
>
> static int crc_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *c, struct pwm_device *pwm,
In the absence of documentation this looks reasonable.
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
