On Sat, 20 Jun 2020, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi All, > > Here is v3 of my patch series converting the i915 driver's code for > controlling the panel's backlight with an external PWM controller to > use the atomic PWM API. See below for the changelog. > > Initially the plan was for this series to consist of 2 parts: > 1. convert the pwm-crc driver to support the atomic PWM API and > 2. convert the i915 driver's PWM code to use the atomic PWM API. > > But during testing I've found a number of bugs in the pwm-lpss and I > found that the acpi_lpss code needs some special handling because of > some ugliness found in most Cherry Trail DSDTs. > > So now this series has grown somewhat large and consists of 4 parts: > > 1. acpi_lpss fixes workarounds for Cherry Trail DSTD nastiness > 2. various fixes to the pwm-lpss driver > 3. convert the pwm-crc driver to support the atomic PWM API and > 4. convert the i915 driver's PWM code to use the atomic PWM API > > So we need to discuss how to merge this (once it passes review). > Although the inter-dependencies are only runtime I still think we should > make sure that 1-3 are in the drm-intel-next-queued (dinq) tree before > merging the i915 changes. Both to make sure that the intel-gfx CI system > does not become unhappy and for bisecting reasons. > > The involved acpi_lpss and pwm drivers do not see a whole lot of churn, so > it likely is the easiest to just merge everything through dinq. > > Rafael and Thierry, can I get your Acked-by for directly merging this into > dinq? > > This series has been tested (and re-tested after adding various bug-fixes) > extensively. It has been tested on the following devices: > > -Asus T100TA BYT + CRC-PMIC PWM > -Toshiba WT8-A BYT + CRC-PMIC PWM > -Thundersoft TS178 BYT + CRC-PMIC PWM, inverse PWM > -Asus T100HA CHT + CRC-PMIC PWM > -Terra Pad 1061 BYT + LPSS PWM > -Trekstor Twin 10.1 BYT + LPSS PWM > -Asus T101HA CHT + CRC-PMIC PWM > -GPD Pocket CHT + CRC-PMIC PWM For the drm/i915 patches 12-15, Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> I eyeballed through them, and didn't spot anything obviously wrong, but at the same time didn't have the time to do an in-depth review. That said, I do have a lot of trust in you testing this with all the above devices. I think that's enough for merging. As for that matter, I'm fine with merging this via whichever tree you find best. Kind of stating the obvious, but please do ensure you have the proper acks in place for this. BR, Jani. > > Changelog: > > Changes in v2: > - Fix coverletter subject > - Drop accidentally included debugging patch > - "[PATCH v3 02/15] ACPI / LPSS: Save Cherry Trail PWM ctx registers only once ( > - Move #define LPSS_SAVE_CTX_ONCE define to group it with LPSS_SAVE_CTX > > Changes in v3: > - "[PATCH v3 04/15] pwm: lpss: Add range limit check for the base_unit register value" > - Use base_unit_range - 1 as maximum value for the clamp() > - "[PATCH v3 05/15] pwm: lpss: Use pwm_lpss_apply() when restoring state on resume" > - This replaces the "pwm: lpss: Set SW_UPDATE bit when enabling the PWM" > patch from previous versions of this patch-set, which really was a hack > working around the resume issue which this patch fixes properly. > - PATCH v3 6 - 11 pwm-crc changes: > - Various small changes resulting from the reviews by Andy and Uwe, > including some refactoring of the patches to reduce the amount of churn > in the patch-set > > Regards, > > Hans > -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
