Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] ACPI/IORT: Make iort_match_node_callback walk the ACPI namespace for NC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Lorenzo,

On 2020/6/19 16:20, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
When the iort_match_node_callback is invoked for a named component
the match should be executed upon a device with an ACPI companion.

For devices with no ACPI companion set-up the ACPI device tree must be
walked in order to find the first parent node with a companion set and
check the parent node against the named component entry to check whether
there is a match and therefore an IORT node describing the in/out ID
translation for the device has been found.

Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
index 28a6b387e80e..5eee81758184 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
@@ -264,15 +264,31 @@ static acpi_status iort_match_node_callback(struct acpi_iort_node *node,
if (node->type == ACPI_IORT_NODE_NAMED_COMPONENT) {
  		struct acpi_buffer buf = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
-		struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device_node(dev->fwnode);
+		struct acpi_device *adev;
  		struct acpi_iort_named_component *ncomp;
+		struct device *nc_dev = dev;
+
+		/*
+		 * Walk the device tree to find a device with an
+		 * ACPI companion; there is no point in scanning
+		 * IORT for a device matching a named component if
+		 * the device does not have an ACPI companion to
+		 * start with.
+		 */
+		do {
+			adev = ACPI_COMPANION(nc_dev);
+			if (adev)
+				break;
+
+			nc_dev = nc_dev->parent;
+		} while (nc_dev);

I'm lost here, we need the ACPI_COMPANION (the same as
to_acpi_device_node()) of the device, but why do we need to go
up to find the parent node?

For a platform device, if I use its parent's full path name for
its named component entry, then it will match, but this will violate
the IORT spec.

Thanks
Hanjun




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux