Re: Remove last acpi procfs dirs after being marked deprecated for a decade

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 6:07 PM Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Am Mittwoch, 27. Mai 2020, 17:49:09 CEST schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:33 PM Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Kernel development should not be hindered anymore by this absolutely
> > > outdated stuff.
> >
> > Well, this is a bit vague.
> >
> > I'm not against making this change, but why do it now?  Is there
> > anything in particular that cannot be done without it?
>
> Because of the deprecated message being shown on laptops booting with
> the option enabled. I got a bugreport about it recently.
>
> I could not please check_patch to properly include this commit id
> (recon the double quotes in the title):
>
> e63f6e28dda6de3de2392ddca321e211fd860925
> Date:   Mon Jul 7 01:13:46 2014 +0200
>
>     Revert "ACPI / AC: Remove AC's proc directory."
>
>     Revert commit ab0fd674d6ce (ACPI / AC: Remove AC's proc directory.),
>     because some old tools (e.g. kpowersave from kde 3.5.10) are still
>     using /proc/acpi/ac_adapter.
>
>     Fixes: ab0fd674d6ce (ACPI / AC: Remove AC's proc directory.)
>
>
> kpowersave was written by myself and I can say for sure, that this stuff
> is more than outdated.

Fair enough, but I'd rather stage it for 5.9 to give it a full cycle
of baking in linux-next.

Thanks!



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux