On Tue 2020-05-26 10:37:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 8:26 PM Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Use the new device_to_pm() helper to access Power Management callbacs
> > (struct dev_pm_ops) for a particular device (struct device_driver).
> >
> > No functional change intended.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/device_pm.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c b/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> > index 5832bc10aca8..b98a32c48fbe 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> > @@ -1022,9 +1022,10 @@ static bool acpi_dev_needs_resume(struct device *dev, struct acpi_device *adev)
> > int acpi_subsys_prepare(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
> > + const struct dev_pm_ops *pm = driver_to_pm(dev->driver);
>
> I don't really see a reason for this change.
>
> What's wrong with the check below?
Duplicated code. Yes, compiler can sort it out, but... new version
looks better to me.
Best regards,
pavel
> >
> > - if (dev->driver && dev->driver->pm && dev->driver->pm->prepare) {
> > - int ret = dev->driver->pm->prepare(dev);
> > + if (pm && pm->prepare) {
> > + int ret = pm->prepare(dev);
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
