On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 6:52 AM David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-04-29 at 05:20 +0000, Williams, Dan J wrote: > > The *patch* is not trying to overrule NVME, and the best I can say is > > that the Intel Linux team was not in the loop when this was being > > decided between the platform BIOS implemenation and whomever thought > > they could just publish random ACPI properties that impacted NVME > > operation [1]. > > > > So now David is trying to get these platform unbroken because they are > > already shipping with this b0rkage. > > This is what we have WARN_TAINT() for though, right? It can suitably > warn users when such breakage is detected in the platform. > I see WARN_TAINT() as "BIOS implemented its specification wrong". This case is BIOS "implemented a mechanism in the wrong specification".
