Re: [PATCH -next] ACPI: debug: Make two functions static

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, May 7, 2020 9:07:36 AM CEST Zheng Zengkai wrote:
> Fix sparse warnings:
> 
> drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c:748:12: warning:
>  symbol 'acpi_aml_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c:774:13: warning:
>  symbol 'acpi_aml_exit' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c
> index 7a265c2171c0..6041974c7627 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c
> @@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ static const struct acpi_debugger_ops acpi_aml_debugger = {
>  	.notify_command_complete = acpi_aml_notify_command_complete,
>  };
>  
> -int __init acpi_aml_init(void)
> +static int __init acpi_aml_init(void)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> @@ -771,7 +771,7 @@ int __init acpi_aml_init(void)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -void __exit acpi_aml_exit(void)
> +static void __exit acpi_aml_exit(void)
>  {
>  	if (acpi_aml_initialized) {
>  		acpi_unregister_debugger(&acpi_aml_debugger);
> 

Applied as 5.8 material, thanks!







[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux