Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] iio: light: cm32181: Switch to new style i2c-driver probe function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 5/3/20 12:54 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 19:29:13 +0200
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Switch to the new style i2c-driver probe_new probe function and drop the
unnecessary i2c_device_id table (we do not have any old style board files
using this).

This is a preparation patch for adding ACPI binding support.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v3:
- This is a new patch in v3 of this patch-set
---
  drivers/iio/light/cm32181.c | 15 +++------------
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/cm32181.c b/drivers/iio/light/cm32181.c
index 5f4fb5674fa0..cc57190a24cb 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/light/cm32181.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/light/cm32181.c
@@ -294,8 +294,7 @@ static const struct iio_info cm32181_info = {
  	.attrs			= &cm32181_attribute_group,
  };
-static int cm32181_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
-			const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+static int cm32181_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
  {
  	struct cm32181_chip *cm32181;
  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
@@ -316,7 +315,7 @@ static int cm32181_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
  	indio_dev->channels = cm32181_channels;
  	indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(cm32181_channels);
  	indio_dev->info = &cm32181_info;
-	indio_dev->name = id->name;
+	indio_dev->name = dev_name(&client->dev);

ABI breakage.  The name needs to be unaffected by this patch and I'm
fairly sure it just gained the vendor prefix.

So to drop that table, you need to provide the 'clean' part number
somewhere else.  Seeing as driver currently only supports one number,
you could just provide it directly here. However, as you are
going to add support for another part number later, you'll need
to do something more clever when you introduce that.

Ok, I will fix this for the next version.

I'll make this suggestion in that patch, but I think you should add
a chip_info structure for each of the supported chips rather than using
a switch to put a number of different elements in place.  The name
would then go in there.

Ok, I will add a chip_info structure for the next version (version 4).

Regards,

Hans




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux