Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI/IORT: take _DMA methods into account for named components

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:27:53 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Where IORT nodes for named components can describe simple DMA limits
> expressed as the number of address bits a device can drive, _DMA methods
> in AML can express more complex topologies, involving DMA translation in
> particular.
> 
> Currently, we only take this _DMA method into account if it appears on a
> ACPI device node describing a PCIe root complex, but it is perfectly
> acceptable to use them for named components as well, so let's ensure
> we take them into account in those cases too.
> 
> [...]

Applied to arm64 (for-next/acpi), thanks!

[1/1] ACPI/IORT: take _DMA methods into account for named components
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/7fb89e1d44cb

Cheers,
-- 
Will

https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux