[PATCH -next] ACPI / CPPC: Make some symbols static

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fix the following sparse warnings:

drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:353:20: warning: symbol 'cppc_mbox_cl' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:600:5: warning: symbol 'pcc_data_alloc' was not declared. Should it be static?

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
index 8b2e89c..f818400 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
@@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static void cppc_chan_tx_done(struct mbox_client *cl, void *msg, int ret)
 				*(u16 *)msg, ret);
 }
 
-struct mbox_client cppc_mbox_cl = {
+static struct mbox_client cppc_mbox_cl = {
 	.tx_done = cppc_chan_tx_done,
 	.knows_txdone = true,
 };
@@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ bool __weak cpc_ffh_supported(void)
  *
  * Return: 0 for success, errno for failure
  */
-int pcc_data_alloc(int pcc_ss_id)
+static int pcc_data_alloc(int pcc_ss_id)
 {
 	if (pcc_ss_id < 0 || pcc_ss_id >= MAX_PCC_SUBSPACES)
 		return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.6.2




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux