On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 6:36 PM Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 4/17/20 5:53 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Does the patch below (untested) make any difference?
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/ec.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> > +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> > @@ -2067,7 +2067,10 @@ static struct acpi_driver acpi_ec_driver
> > .add = acpi_ec_add,
> > .remove = acpi_ec_remove,
> > },
> > - .drv.pm = &acpi_ec_pm,
> > + .drv = {
> > + .probe_type = PROBE_FORCE_SYNCHRONOUS,
> > + .pm = &acpi_ec_pm,
> > + },
> > };
> >
> > static void acpi_ec_destroy_workqueues(void)
> I'd say no, but for completeness:
OK, it looks like mainline commit
65a691f5f8f0 ("ACPI: EC: Do not clear boot_ec_is_ecdt in acpi_ec_add()")
was backported into 5.6.5 by mistake.
Can you please revert that patch and retest?
