On Sunday, March 29, 2020 4:21:09 PM CEST Qian Cai wrote:
> Similar to the commit 0266d81e9bf5 ("acpi/processor: Prevent cpu hotplug
> deadlock") except this is for acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe():
>
> "The problem is that the work is scheduled on the current CPU from the
> hotplug thread associated with that CPU.
>
> It's not required to invoke these functions via the workqueue because
> the hotplug thread runs on the target CPU already.
>
> Check whether current is a per cpu thread pinned on the target CPU and
> invoke the function directly to avoid the workqueue."
>
> Since CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR (for cstate.c) selects
> CONFIG_ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS (for processor_throttling.c) on x86, just
> make call_on_cpu() a static inline function from processor_throttling.c
> and use it in cstate.c.
>
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> ------------------------------------------------------
> cpuhp/1/15 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffffc90003447a28 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x4c6/0x630
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffffffffafa1c0e8 (cpuidle_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpuidle_pause_and_lock+0x17/0x20
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
> cpus_read_lock+0x3e/0xc0
> irq_calc_affinity_vectors+0x5f/0x91
> __pci_enable_msix_range+0x10f/0x9a0
> pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity+0x13e/0x1f0
> pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity at drivers/pci/msi.c:1208
> pqi_ctrl_init+0x72f/0x1618 [smartpqi]
> pqi_pci_probe.cold.63+0x882/0x892 [smartpqi]
> local_pci_probe+0x7a/0xc0
> work_for_cpu_fn+0x2e/0x50
> process_one_work+0x57e/0xb90
> worker_thread+0x363/0x5b0
> kthread+0x1f4/0x220
> ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50
>
> -> #0 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
> __lock_acquire+0x2244/0x32a0
> lock_acquire+0x1a2/0x680
> __flush_work+0x4e6/0x630
> work_on_cpu+0x114/0x160
> acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe+0x129/0x250
> acpi_processor_evaluate_cst+0x4c8/0x580
> acpi_processor_get_power_info+0x86/0x740
> acpi_processor_hotplug+0xc3/0x140
> acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x102/0x1d0
> cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x197/0x1120
> cpuhp_thread_fun+0x252/0x2f0
> smpboot_thread_fn+0x255/0x440
> kthread+0x1f4/0x220
> ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> Chain exists of:
> (work_completion)(&wfc.work) --> cpuhp_state-up --> cpuidle_lock
>
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> lock(cpuidle_lock);
> lock(cpuhp_state-up);
> lock(cpuidle_lock);
> lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work));
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> 3 locks held by cpuhp/1/15:
> #0: ffffffffaf51ab10 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x69/0x2f0
> #1: ffffffffaf51ad40 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x69/0x2f0
> #2: ffffffffafa1c0e8 (cpuidle_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpuidle_pause_and_lock+0x17/0x20
>
> Call Trace:
> dump_stack+0xa0/0xea
> print_circular_bug.cold.52+0x147/0x14c
> check_noncircular+0x295/0x2d0
> __lock_acquire+0x2244/0x32a0
> lock_acquire+0x1a2/0x680
> __flush_work+0x4e6/0x630
> work_on_cpu+0x114/0x160
> acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe+0x129/0x250
> acpi_processor_evaluate_cst+0x4c8/0x580
> acpi_processor_get_power_info+0x86/0x740
> acpi_processor_hotplug+0xc3/0x140
> acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x102/0x1d0
> cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x197/0x1120
> cpuhp_thread_fun+0x252/0x2f0
> smpboot_thread_fn+0x255/0x440
> kthread+0x1f4/0x220
> ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50
>
> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
> ---
>
> v2:
> Make call_on_cpu() a static inline function to avoid a compilation
> error when ACPI_PROCESSOR=m thanks to lkp@xxxxxxxxx.
>
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c | 7 -------
> include/acpi/processor.h | 10 ++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
> index caf2edccbad2..49ae4e1ac9cd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
> @@ -161,7 +161,8 @@ int acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe(unsigned int cpu,
>
> /* Make sure we are running on right CPU */
>
> - retval = work_on_cpu(cpu, acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe_cpu, cx);
> + retval = call_on_cpu(cpu, acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe_cpu, cx,
> + false);
> if (retval == 0) {
> /* Use the hint in CST */
> percpu_entry->states[cx->index].eax = cx->address;
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c
> index 532a1ae3595a..a0bd56ece3ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c
> @@ -897,13 +897,6 @@ static long __acpi_processor_get_throttling(void *data)
> return pr->throttling.acpi_processor_get_throttling(pr);
> }
>
> -static int call_on_cpu(int cpu, long (*fn)(void *), void *arg, bool direct)
> -{
> - if (direct || (is_percpu_thread() && cpu == smp_processor_id()))
> - return fn(arg);
> - return work_on_cpu(cpu, fn, arg);
> -}
> -
> static int acpi_processor_get_throttling(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> {
> if (!pr)
> diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h
> index 47805172e73d..770d226b22f2 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/processor.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/processor.h
> @@ -297,6 +297,16 @@ static inline void acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_enter(struct acpi_processor_cx
> }
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS
Why does this depend on CONFIG_ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS?
> +static inline int call_on_cpu(int cpu, long (*fn)(void *), void *arg,
> + bool direct)
> +{
> + if (direct || (is_percpu_thread() && cpu == smp_processor_id()))
> + return fn(arg);
> + return work_on_cpu(cpu, fn, arg);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> /* in processor_perflib.c */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
>
