On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 09:32:26PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:19 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> The new macro set has a consistent namespace and uses C99 initializers
> >> instead of the grufty C89 ones.
> >>
> >> Rename the local macro wrapper to X86_MATCH for consistency. It stays for
> >> readability sake.
> >
> >> + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ATOM_SILVERMONT, NULL),
> >> + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ATOM_AIRMONT, NULL),
> >
> >> -#define ICPU(model) { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, model, X86_FEATURE_ANY, }
> >> +#define X86_MATCH(model) X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(model, NULL)
> >
> > Maybe we can do a generic macro to avoid all these ', NULL' repetitions?
>
> I opted for having the data argument everywhere to keep the macro maze
> small. And we have enough places where data is actually used.
+1
--mark
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
