If I understood it right the ports should be numbered using the "port"
property and not the "reg" property. I stumbled over it during
extending the v4l2_fwnode_parse_link() helper which also use the "port"
property.
Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Hi,
I don't know if this is right since I'm not a ACPI guy *sorry*
Anyway reading the doc description and the v4l2_fwnode_parse_link() code
give me a 2/3 chance.
Regards,
Marco
Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/dsd/graph.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/dsd/graph.rst b/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/dsd/graph.rst
index 1a6ce7afba5e..dcf0102aeb29 100644
--- a/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/dsd/graph.rst
+++ b/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/dsd/graph.rst
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ A simple example of this is show below::
Name (PRT0, Package() {
ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
Package () {
- Package () { "reg", 0 },
+ Package () { "port", 0 },
},
ToUUID("dbb8e3e6-5886-4ba6-8795-1319f52a966b"),
Package () {
--
2.20.1
