On 02.03.20 15:03, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 02-03-20 14:49:31, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> Will be needed by virtio-mem to identify the node from a pxm. > > No objection to export the symbol. But it is almost always better to add > the export in the patch that actually uses it. The intention is much > more clear that way. Yeah, but I guess this way people might take more likely a look as if this would be squashed into a 5 files changed, 1786 insertions(+) patch. At least that's what my experience tells me :) If there are hard feelings, I can squash (but I am afraid it will be even harder to get ACKs/RBs for core-mm changes that way ...) Thanks for having a look! -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
