Re: [PATCH 1/2] acpi/nfit: improve bounds checking for 'func'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 8:20 AM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The 'func' variable can come from the user in the __nd_ioctl().  If it's
> too high then the (1 << func) shift in acpi_nfit_clear_to_send() is
> undefined.  In acpi_nfit_ctl() we pass 'func' to test_bit(func, &dsm_mask)
> which could result in an out of bounds access.
>
> To fix these issues, I introduced the NVDIMM_CMD_MAX (31) define and
> updated nfit_dsm_revid() to use that define as well instead of magic
> numbers.
>
> Fixes: 11189c1089da ("acpi/nfit: Fix command-supported detection")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>

I'll apply this to my fixes branch.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux