Re: About PPTT find_acpi_cpu_topology_package()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:52:09AM +0000, John Garry wrote:

[...]

>
> As for when it's not set, it's unclear. My understanding is that the ACPI
> processor id should still be used as the non-leaf node identifier, but it
> would not match a UID for a processor container (as it may not exist).
>

I can't infer anything that matches your understanding from the spec in
this regard. If it's not set, then it is left to OSPM.

> The kernel does have behave according to this.
>

According to what in the specification ?

> So how I am misinterpreting this?
>

May be you are not, it is just ambiguous in the spec, worth checking and
fixing if it is an issue. I reiterate we don't want to generate anything
in the OS for this purpose.

--
Regards,
Sudeep



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux