Re: Fwd: [pm:bleeding-edge] BUILD REGRESSION 208501f6808a1dc0205904ed84cac99da01bbf70

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 1:27 AM Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 11:14:16AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi Dmitry,
> >
> > Unfortunately, this report was sent directly to me without any CCs to
> > mailing lists.
> >
> > This is a tree with the v9 of the last patch from the software nodes series
> > merged.
>
> I tried fetching your linux-pm tree, but it does not contain the commit
> Kbuild referenced. But you must be testing with an old version of tests
> because I see the largest frame at 600 bytes, not the 2.5-3K as in your
> logs:
>
> dtor@dtor-ws:~/kernel/linux-next (swnode-refs-v9)$ make CFLAGS_KERNEL=-Wframe-larger-than=512
> drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.o
>   CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
>   CALL    scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh
>   DESCEND  objtool
>   CC      drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.o
> drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c: In function ‘pe_test_uint_arrays’:
> drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c:214:1: warning: the frame size of 600 bytes is larger than 512 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
>  }
>
> Could you please try the 0-day on your tree again?

I will.

Cheers,
Rafael



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux