On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 03:55:39PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > Hmm, there's no functional dependency though, is there? AFAICS it's > essentially just a context conflict. Is it worth simply dropping (or > postponing) the local renaming in __dma_direct_optimal_gfp_mask(), or > perhaps even cross-merging arm64/for-next/zone-dma into dma/for-next? I would have no problem with pulling it in. I'd kinda hate creating the conflict, though. So if the arm64 maintainers are fine with it I'll pull it in, especially if I get an ACK from Robin.
