RE: [PATCH] ACPI: support for NXP i2c controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 02.09.19 23:16, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 11:58 PM Rafael J. Wysocki
> > > <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 12:35 PM Chuanhua Han
> > >> <chuanhua.han@xxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Enable NXP i2c controller to boot with ACPI
> > >>>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Meenakshi Aggarwal <meenakshi.aggarwal@xxxxxxx>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar <udit.kumar@xxxxxxx>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Chuanhua Han <chuanhua.han@xxxxxxx>
> > >>
> > >> Wolfram, any objections to this from the i2c side?
> > >
> > > May I propose amendment(s)?
> > >
> > >>> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
> > >>>   #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > >>>   #include <linux/sched.h>
> > >>>   #include <linux/slab.h>
> > >
> > >>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> > >
> > > If it's kept in order, better to go with it. (Yes, it is as I have
> > > checked) However, property.h should be included instead, see below.
Ok, got it. I will fix it in v2.
> > >
> > >>>          const struct of_device_id *of_id =
> > of_match_device(i2c_imx_dt_ids,
> > >>>
> > >>> &pdev->dev);
> > >>> +       const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_id =
> > >>> +                       acpi_match_device(i2c_imx_acpi_ids,
> > >>> +                                         &pdev->dev);
> > >
> > >
> > >>>          if (of_id)
> > >>>                  i2c_imx->hwdata = of_id->data;
> > >>> +       else if (acpi_id)
> > >>> +               i2c_imx->hwdata = (struct imx_i2c_hwdata *)
> > >>> +                               acpi_id->driver_data;
> > >
> > >
> > > The above altogher may be replaced with
> > >
> > > const struct imx_i2c_hwdata *match;
> > > ...
> > > match = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> > > if (match)
> > >   i2c_imx->hwdata = match;
> > > else
> > > ...
> >
Ok, I will correct it in v2.
> > Instead of "may be replaced", I would say: it should be replaced :)
> >
> > >>> +               .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(i2c_imx_acpi_ids),
> > >
> > > Since there is no #ifdef guard no need to use ACPI_PTR().
> > >
> >
> > What iMX/(other NXP?) SoCs are with ACPI support?  Where I can get
> > one? I would like to know more about it.
> - Nxp has variety Socs, include i.MX, Layerscape, etc.
> - You can get one from here
> https://www.nxp.com/design/qoriq-developer-resources/qoriq-lx2160a-develo
> pment-board:LX2160A-RDB
> 
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Oleksij Rempel
> >
> > --
> > Pengutronix e.K.                           |
> > |
> > Industrial Linux Solutions                 |
> > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.p
> > e
> ngutronix.de%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cmeenakshi.aggarwal%40nxp.com%
> >
> 7C640eb015a91f4959d3b508d7303168fb%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c
> >
> 301635%7C0%7C0%7C637030861076879938&amp;sdata=sPWtkVtHHDvoRR
> > ZmWJuipCO%2BEwG%2BcupgZvcIV1%2BrlEY%3D&amp;reserved=0  |
> Peiner Str.
> > 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0
> > |
> > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:
> > +49-5121-206917-5555 |




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux