Re: [PATCH] acpi/hmat: ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY_PD_VALID is deprecated in ACPI-6.3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 6:24 AM Daniel Black <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ACPI-6.3 corresponds to when hmat revision was bumped from
> 1 to 2. In this version ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY_PD_VALID was
> deprecated and made reserved.
>
> As such in revision 2+ we shouldn't be testing this flag.
>
> This is as per ACPI-6.3, 5.2.27.3, Table 5-145
> "Memory Proximity Domain Attributes Structure"
> for Flags.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Black <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Keith, any comments?

> ---
>  drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c b/drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c
> index 96b7d39a97c6..e938e34673d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c
> @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static int __init hmat_parse_proximity_domain(union acpi_subtable_headers *heade
>                 pr_info("HMAT: Memory Flags:%04x Processor Domain:%d Memory Domain:%d\n",
>                         p->flags, p->processor_PD, p->memory_PD);
>
> -       if (p->flags & ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY_PD_VALID) {
> +       if (p->flags & ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY_PD_VALID && hmat_revision == 1) {
>                 target = find_mem_target(p->memory_PD);
>                 if (!target) {
>                         pr_debug("HMAT: Memory Domain missing from SRAT\n");
> --
> 2.21.0
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux