On Monday, August 12, 2019 10:59:58 AM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 4:30 PM Keith Busch <keith.busch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > There are multiple scenarios where the HMAT may contain information > > about proximity domains that are not currently online. Rather than fail > > to report any HMAT data just elide those offline domains. > > > > If and when those domains are later onlined they can be added to the > > HMEM reporting at that point. > > > > This was found while testing EFI_MEMORY_SP support which reserves > > "specific purpose" memory from the general allocation pool. If that > > reservation results in an empty numa-node then the node is not marked > > online leading a spurious: > > > > "acpi/hmat: Ignoring HMAT: Invalid table" > > > > ...result for HMAT parsing. > > > > Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@xxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> > > When you send somebody else's patches, you should sign them off as a > rule, but since you sent this one with your own R-by, I converted that > to a S-o-b. > And all patches in the series have been applied. Thanks!
