There is no need to check twice for a NULL in fwnode_call_bool_op().
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/fwnode.h | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/fwnode.h b/include/linux/fwnode.h
index a11c8c56c78b..ababd6bc82f3 100644
--- a/include/linux/fwnode.h
+++ b/include/linux/fwnode.h
@@ -110,10 +110,11 @@ struct fwnode_operations {
(fwnode ? (fwnode_has_op(fwnode, op) ? \
(fwnode)->ops->op(fwnode, ## __VA_ARGS__) : -ENXIO) : \
-EINVAL)
-#define fwnode_call_bool_op(fwnode, op, ...) \
- (fwnode ? (fwnode_has_op(fwnode, op) ? \
- (fwnode)->ops->op(fwnode, ## __VA_ARGS__) : false) : \
- false)
+
+#define fwnode_call_bool_op(fwnode, op, ...) \
+ (fwnode_has_op(fwnode, op) ? \
+ (fwnode)->ops->op(fwnode, ## __VA_ARGS__) : false)
+
#define fwnode_call_ptr_op(fwnode, op, ...) \
(fwnode_has_op(fwnode, op) ? \
(fwnode)->ops->op(fwnode, ## __VA_ARGS__) : NULL)
--
2.23.0.rc1
