Re: [PATCH] ACPI / LPSS: Don't skip late system PM ops for hibernate on BYT/CHT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Rafael,

<snip>

Sorry for the long delay.

I haven't dropped this issue on the floor, I hope that you are still able to follow up here.

Can you please test the appended patch instead of the previous one?

I have found some inconsistencies in the handling of hibernation in the ACPI PM domain
and the LPSS driver that should be covered by this patch.

I know this is just a testing patch for now, but still I've given it
a quick look, some comments inline.

---
  drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c |   63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
  drivers/acpi/device_pm.c |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++--
  include/linux/acpi.h     |    4 ++
  3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
@@ -1171,6 +1171,32 @@ int acpi_subsys_thaw_noirq(struct device
  	return pm_generic_thaw_noirq(dev);
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_subsys_thaw_noirq);
+
+/**
+ * acpi_subsys_restore_noirq - Run the device driver's "noirq" restore callback.
+ * @dev: Device to handle.
+ */
+int acpi_subsys_restore_noirq(struct device *dev)
+{
+	/* This is analogous to what acpi_subsys_resune_noirq() does. */
+	if (dev_pm_smart_suspend_and_suspended(dev))
+		pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
+
+	return pm_generic_restore_noirq(dev);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_subsys_restore_noirq);
+
+/**
+ * acpi_subsys_restore_early - Restore device using ACPI.
+ * @dev: Device to restore.
+ */
+int acpi_subsys_restore_early(struct device *dev)
+{
+	int ret = acpi_dev_resume(dev);
+	return ret ? ret : pm_generic_restore_early(dev);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_subsys_restore_early);
+
  #endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
static struct dev_pm_domain acpi_general_pm_domain = {
@@ -1192,8 +1218,8 @@ static struct dev_pm_domain acpi_general
  		.poweroff = acpi_subsys_suspend,
  		.poweroff_late = acpi_subsys_suspend_late,
  		.poweroff_noirq = acpi_subsys_suspend_noirq,
-		.restore_noirq = acpi_subsys_resume_noirq,
-		.restore_early = acpi_subsys_resume_early,
+		.restore_noirq = acpi_subsys_restore_noirq,
+		.restore_early = acpi_subsys_restore_early,
  #endif
  	},
  };
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
@@ -1069,36 +1069,67 @@ static int acpi_lpss_suspend_noirq(struc
  	return acpi_subsys_suspend_noirq(dev);
  }
-static int acpi_lpss_do_resume_early(struct device *dev)
+static int acpi_lpss_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
  {
-	int ret = acpi_lpss_resume(dev);
+	struct lpss_private_data *pdata = acpi_driver_data(ACPI_COMPANION(dev));
+
+	/* Follow acpi_subsys_resune_noirq(). */
+	if (dev_pm_may_skip_resume(dev))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (dev_pm_smart_suspend_and_suspended(dev))
+		pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
- return ret ? ret : pm_generic_resume_early(dev);
+	if (pdata->dev_desc->resume_from_noirq) {
+		int ret = acpi_lpss_resume(dev);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	return pm_generic_resume_noirq(dev);
  }

Hmm, normally acpi_lpss_resume runs at resume_early time, AFAIK
the order of resume callbacks calling is: resume_noirq, resume_early, resume

So normally our call order is:

---noirq-phase---
pm_generic_resume_noirq()
---early-phase---
acpi_lpss_resume()
pm_generic_resume_early()

My patch adding the resume_from_noirq flag, move the calling of
acpi_lpss_resume() to the resume_noirq phase (if the flag is
set) but kept the generic order, so the call order with the
flag set currently is:

---noirq-phase---
pm_generic_resume_noirq()
acpi_lpss_resume()
---early-phase---
pm_generic_resume_early()

So the order of the 3 calls relative to each other did not change.

You are changing this to:

---noirq-phase---
acpi_lpss_resume()
pm_generic_resume_noirq()
---early-phase---
pm_generic_resume_early()

So now when the flag is set acpi_lpss_resume() runs before
pm_generic_resume_noirq(). Is this intentional ?

Regards,

Hans




static int acpi_lpss_resume_early(struct device *dev)
  {
  	struct lpss_private_data *pdata = acpi_driver_data(ACPI_COMPANION(dev));
- if (pdata->dev_desc->resume_from_noirq)
-		return 0;
+	if (!pdata->dev_desc->resume_from_noirq) {
+		int ret = acpi_lpss_resume(dev);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
- return acpi_lpss_do_resume_early(dev);
+	return pm_generic_resume_early(dev);
  }
-static int acpi_lpss_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
+static int acpi_lpss_restore_noirq(struct device *dev)
  {
  	struct lpss_private_data *pdata = acpi_driver_data(ACPI_COMPANION(dev));
-	int ret;
- ret = acpi_subsys_resume_noirq(dev);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+	/* Follow acpi_subsys_restore_noirq(). */
+	if (dev_pm_smart_suspend_and_suspended(dev))
+		pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
+
+	if (pdata->dev_desc->resume_from_noirq) {
+		int ret = acpi_lpss_resume(dev);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	return pm_generic_restore_noirq(dev);
+}
+
+static int acpi_lpss_restore_early(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct lpss_private_data *pdata = acpi_driver_data(ACPI_COMPANION(dev));
- if (!dev_pm_may_skip_resume(dev) && pdata->dev_desc->resume_from_noirq)
-		ret = acpi_lpss_do_resume_early(dev);
+	if (!pdata->dev_desc->resume_from_noirq) {
+		int ret = acpi_lpss_resume(dev);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
- return ret;
+	return pm_generic_restore_early(dev);
  }
#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
@@ -1140,8 +1171,8 @@ static struct dev_pm_domain acpi_lpss_pm
  		.poweroff = acpi_subsys_suspend,
  		.poweroff_late = acpi_lpss_suspend_late,
  		.poweroff_noirq = acpi_lpss_suspend_noirq,
-		.restore_noirq = acpi_lpss_resume_noirq,
-		.restore_early = acpi_lpss_resume_early,
+		.restore_noirq = acpi_lpss_restore_noirq,
+		.restore_early = acpi_lpss_restore_early,
  #endif
  		.runtime_suspend = acpi_lpss_runtime_suspend,
  		.runtime_resume = acpi_lpss_runtime_resume,
Index: linux-pm/include/linux/acpi.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ linux-pm/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -925,6 +925,8 @@ int acpi_subsys_freeze(struct device *de
  int acpi_subsys_freeze_late(struct device *dev);
  int acpi_subsys_freeze_noirq(struct device *dev);
  int acpi_subsys_thaw_noirq(struct device *dev);
+int acpi_subsys_restore_noirq(struct device *dev);
+int acpi_subsys_restore_early(struct device *dev);
  #else
  static inline int acpi_dev_resume_early(struct device *dev) { return 0; }
  static inline int acpi_subsys_prepare(struct device *dev) { return 0; }
@@ -938,6 +940,8 @@ static inline int acpi_subsys_freeze(str
  static inline int acpi_subsys_freeze_late(struct device *dev) { return 0; }
  static inline int acpi_subsys_freeze_noirq(struct device *dev) { return 0; }
  static inline int acpi_subsys_thaw_noirq(struct device *dev) { return 0; }
+static inline int acpi_subsys_restore_noirq(struct device *dev) { return 0; }
+static inline int acpi_subsys_restore_early(struct device *dev) { return 0; }
  #endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI






[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux