On 18/06/2019 15:21, Jeremy Linton wrote: [...] >>> + * Return: -ENOENT if the PPTT doesn't exist, the CPU cannot be found or >>> + * the table revision isn't new enough. >>> + * Otherwise returns flag value >>> + */ >> >> Nit: strictly speaking we're not returning the flag value but its mask >> applied to the flags field. I don't think anyone will care about getting >> the actual flag value, but it should be made obvious in the doc: > > Or I clarify the code to actually do what the comments says. Maybe that is what John G was also pointing out too? > Mmm I didn't find any reply from John regarding this in v1, but I wouldn't mind either way, as long as the doc & code are aligned. [...]
