On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 01:30:56PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> Use the available IRQ helper functions, most of the functions have
> additional helpful side affects like configuring the trigger type of the
> IRQ.
>
> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> No changes since v3.
>
> Apologies Andy but I really can't see a sensible way to split this
> patch up. I have tried moving the resource_list_for_each_loop
> into a function in one patch then switching to using
> acpi_dev_resource_interrupt and i2c_dev_irq_from_resource, but the
> function is basically a completely different function ie. all the
> arguments are different and the purpose is different. So it makes
> no sense, and it is very ping pong. I tried doing the switch to
> i2c_dev_irq_from_resources as a separate patch which isn't so bad,
> but feels pointless as it is such a small change, let me know if you
> really want me to send that version.
>
> Basically the switch to the helper function and the use of
> acpi_dev_resource_interrupt are intrinsically linked, so there isn't
> really a sensible way to split those up. If you still want some
> changes I am afraid you will have to be more specific in what you are
> looking for.
It seems I missed few details, thus the current approach works for me, thanks!
>
> Thanks,
> Charles
>
> drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
> index f1d648962b223..47d5b1c5ec9e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
> @@ -133,14 +133,25 @@ static int i2c_acpi_do_lookup(struct acpi_device *adev,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int i2c_acpi_add_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
> +{
> + int *irq = data;
> + struct resource r;
> +
> + if (*irq <= 0 && acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(ares, 0, &r))
> + *irq = i2c_dev_irq_from_resources(&r, 1);
> +
> + return 1; /* No need to add resource to the list */
> +}
> +
> static int i2c_acpi_get_info(struct acpi_device *adev,
> struct i2c_board_info *info,
> struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
> acpi_handle *adapter_handle)
> {
> struct list_head resource_list;
> - struct resource_entry *entry;
> struct i2c_acpi_lookup lookup;
> + int irq = -ENOENT;
> int ret;
>
> memset(&lookup, 0, sizeof(lookup));
> @@ -172,16 +183,13 @@ static int i2c_acpi_get_info(struct acpi_device *adev,
>
> /* Then fill IRQ number if any */
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
> - ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &resource_list, NULL, NULL);
> + ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &resource_list,
> + i2c_acpi_add_resource, &irq);
> if (ret < 0)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - resource_list_for_each_entry(entry, &resource_list) {
> - if (resource_type(entry->res) == IORESOURCE_IRQ) {
> - info->irq = entry->res->start;
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> + if (irq > 0)
> + info->irq = irq;
>
> acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
>
> --
> 2.11.0
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
