On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 03:57:04PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 02:27:28PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 09:49:34AM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote: > > > Bring the ACPI path in sync with the device tree path and handle all the > > > IRQ fetching at probe time. This leaves the only IRQ handling at device > > > registration time being that which is passed directly through the board > > > info as either a resource or an actual IRQ number. > > > > I don't see issues with this approach. Cc'd Jarkko and Andy just in case > > I missed something. > > I failed to see the i2c_acpi_get_irq() in the current code. > What kernel version do you use? > Can we see the changes against vanilla / i2c-next? > It's added by the first patch in the chain: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/20/281 I could resend the series with you and Jarkko on CC if that would be better. Thanks, Charles
