Hi, On 5/5/19 2:09 AM, Kefeng Wang wrote:
On 2019/5/4 7:24, Jeremy Linton wrote:ACPI 6.3 adds a flag to indicate that child nodes are all identical cores. This is useful to authoritatively determine if a set of (possibly offline) cores are identical or not. Since the flag doesn't give us a unique id we can generate one and use it to create bitmaps of sibling nodes, or simply in a loop to determine if a subset of cores are identical. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@xxxxxxx> --- drivers/acpi/pptt.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/acpi.h | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c index 83a026765faa..1865515297ca 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c @@ -660,3 +660,29 @@ int find_acpi_cpu_topology_package(unsigned int cpu) return find_acpi_cpu_topology_tag(cpu, PPTT_ABORT_PACKAGE, ACPI_PPTT_PHYSICAL_PACKAGE); } + +/** + * find_acpi_cpu_topology_hetero_id() - Get a core architecture tag + * @cpu: Kernel logical CPU number + * + * Determine a unique heterogeneous tag for the given CPU. CPUs with the same + * implementation should have matching tags. + * + * The returned tag can be used to group peers with identical implementation. + * + * The search terminates when a level is found with the identical implementation + * flag set or we reach a root node. + * + * Due to limitations in the PPTT data structure, there may be rare situations + * where two cores in a heterogeneous machine may be identical, but won't have + * the same tag. + * + * Return: -ENOENT if the PPTT doesn't exist, or the CPU cannot be found. + * Otherwise returns a value which represents a group of identical cores + * similar to this CPU. + */ +int find_acpi_cpu_topology_hetero_id(unsigned int cpu) +{ + return find_acpi_cpu_topology_tag(cpu, PPTT_ABORT_PACKAGE, + ACPI_PPTT_ACPI_IDENTICAL); +} diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h index d5dcebd7aad3..1444fb042898 100644 --- a/include/linux/acpi.h +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h @@ -1309,6 +1309,7 @@ static inline int lpit_read_residency_count_address(u64 *address) #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PPTT int find_acpi_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpu, int level); int find_acpi_cpu_topology_package(unsigned int cpu); +int find_acpi_cpu_topology_hetero_id(unsigned int cpu); int find_acpi_cpu_cache_topology(unsigned int cpu, int level); #else static inline int find_acpi_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpu, int level) @@ -1319,6 +1320,10 @@ static inline int find_acpi_cpu_topology_package(unsigned int cpu) { return -EINVAL; }static inline int find_acpi_cpu_topology_hetero_id(unsigned int cpu)
Yes, good catch, I just saw that warning.
+static int find_acpi_cpu_topology_hetero_id(unsigned int cpu) +{ + return -EINVAL; +} static inline int find_acpi_cpu_cache_topology(unsigned int cpu, int level) { return -EINVAL;
