Hi Petr,
Thank you for reviewing these patches.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 01:53:56PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Fri 2019-03-22 17:29:29, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Instead of implementing our own means of discovering parent nodes, node
> > names or counting how many parents a node has, use the newly added
> > functions in the fwnode API to obtain that information.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > lib/vsprintf.c | 37 +++++++++++++++----------------------
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
> > index 5f60b8d41277..91f2a3e4892e 100644
> > --- a/lib/vsprintf.c
> > +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
> > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
> > #include <net/addrconf.h>
> > #include <linux/siphash.h>
> > #include <linux/compiler.h>
> > +#include <linux/property.h>
> > #ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK
> > #include <linux/blkdev.h>
> > #endif
> > @@ -1720,32 +1721,23 @@ char *flags_string(char *buf, char *end, void *flags_ptr, const char *fmt)
> > return format_flags(buf, end, flags, names);
> > }
> >
> > -static const char *device_node_name_for_depth(const struct device_node *np, int depth)
> > -{
> > - for ( ; np && depth; depth--)
> > - np = np->parent;
> > -
> > - return kbasename(np->full_name);
> > -}
> > -
> > static noinline_for_stack
> > -char *device_node_gen_full_name(const struct device_node *np, char *buf, char *end)
> > +char *fwnode_gen_full_name(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, char *buf, char *end)
>
> I first read this as fwnode_get_full_name(), see "get" vs. "gen".
> I guess that it was because there is used also fwnode_get_name().
>
> Please, rename it to fwnode_full_name_string() or so ;-)
Works for me.
--
Regards,
Sakari Ailus
sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
