On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 04:12:43PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 04:06:33PM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 03:13:53PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > Do we support swnode here? > > > > > > > > Good question. The swnodes have no hierarchy at the moment (they're only > > > > created for a struct device as a parent) and they do not have human-readable > > > > names. So I'd say it's not relevant right now. Should these two change, > > > > support for swnode could (and should) be added later on. > > > > > > Heikki, what do you think about this? > > > > Well, the swnodes do have hierarchy. That was kind of the whole point > > of introducing them. They now can also be named using "name" property. > > See commit 344798206f171c5abea7ab1f9762fa526d7f539d. > > Right; I saw the function after initially replying to Andy but I missed > where the node name came from. :-) Now I know... > > I can add support for swnode, too, if you like. Definitely! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
