Re: [PATCH] acpi: bgrt: parse BGRT to obtain BMP address before it gets clobbered

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 3:36 PM Ard Biesheuvel
<ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 16:06, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The bitmap left in the framebuffer by the firmware is described by an
> > ACPI table called "BGRT", which describes the size, pixel format and
> > the address of a BMP image in memory. While the BGRT ACPI table is
> > guaranteed to reside in a "ACPI reclaim" memory region, which is
> > never touched by Linux. The BMP image, however, typically resides
> > in EFI Boot Services Memory, which may have been overwritten by the
> > time the BGRT discovery routine runs.
> >
> > So instead, drop the handling from the ACPI init code, and call the
> > BGRT parsing code immediately after going over the EFI configuration
> > table array, at which time no memory has been touched yet except for
> > the .data/.bss regions covered by the static kernel image.
> >
> > Unfortunately, this involves a non-trivial amount of ACPI entry
> > point and root table parsing, but we cannot rely on the normal
> > ACPI infrastructure yet this early in the boot.
> >
> > Also note that we cannot take the 'acpi_disabled' global variable
> > into account, since it may not have assumed the correct value yet
> > (on arm64, the default value is '1' which is overridden to '0' if
> > no DT description has been made available by the firmware)
> >
> > Cc: Peter Jones <pjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c        |  2 -
> >  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c     |  2 -
> >  drivers/acpi/bgrt.c             |  6 --
> >  drivers/firmware/efi/efi-bgrt.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++--
> >  drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c      | 13 ++++
> >  include/linux/efi-bgrt.h        |  4 +-
> >  6 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Rafael, Len,
>
> Do you mind if i take this via the EFI tree (after addressing
> Lorenzo's comments)

Not at all, please take it.

Thanks!



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux