On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 07:44:42PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 02:03:09PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 11:52 AM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > New quirk enforces search for GPIO based on its type, > > > i.e. iterate over GpioIo resources only. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > > > > - it was sent few weeks ago to Hans for testing, but better to re-test > > > - it's supposed to go via ASoC subsystem due to recent changes made for > > > sound driver > > > > > > v2: > > > - Expand explanation why this quirk might be needed (Mika) > > > > I tried to apply this but it doesn't apply on the GPIO devel > > branch. > > > > I suppose because of Hans de Goede's > > commit 72893f0c6bd399ce84e3c1c9fc69d234fe37d098 > > Author: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Mon Dec 31 21:55:21 2018 +0100 > > > > gpiolib-acpi: Preserve non direction flags when updating gpiod_flags > > > > Could you rebase and resend? > > Linus, as I mentioned in comments above this should go via ASoC tree, there is > no conflicts with gpio/devel for GPIO matters. > > So, please, give your Ack and hopefully Mark will apply this soon. Perhaps Mark can provide you an immutable branch to be merged. > > (Also pick up Mika's ACK.) > > > > PS I'm a bit split about pure ACPI patches, part of me see it as an > > "intel thing" so that you could very well collect it in the Intel > > GPIO tree and send me pull requests, on the other hand it is > > ACPI and sometimes applied in Rafael's tree. Maybe just as good > > that I keep picking them separately like this? I dunno. Let Mika speak up. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
